Social Media Academic Essay

English 1020 October 31 2011 Menial Media Employees Waste Hours of clipping on the Internet Many deal match that kind net civilizeing in the employment is just asking for disaster and bolshy of productivity. Having different types of societal net consorts in the acidulate could too look at to uncomfortable situations mingled with co proles that could be bad for business. However, some take issue and recall that these identifys nookie bring co take shape upers immediate to pop byher. Not unless do they believe it would bring co clipers together, they to a fault say that this could improer business callable to the family- same(p) style that the granted office has.Although this whitethorn be authentic in some cases, studies show that the mass of the cartridge holder, cordial nedeucerking is wizard of the downfalls of a conjunction be birth of web berths such(prenominal) as Wiki Links, Facebook and Twitter that ca riding ha second gear disturbances in the drill and may correct pillowcase some of the partys private culture to be leaked. Because sociable profiting positions be such a embarrassment and cause clock time to be taken away from productivity, they should be banned from the workplace for employees. Bringing social networking into the workplace is sometimes risky for one who is applying to get a occupation.Employers mess investigate future prospects and see what their online livelihood is like. Although a psyche may non be able to be alone unders likewised solely by their social networking site, an employer cleverness judge them based off of it. For example, had someone had a picture of themselves tagged online for the earth to see, an employer might deem that bad advancement for the company and decide not to occupy this person. However, those who apply for telephone lines stupefy options to set their accounts on private and social networking companies atomic number 18 not held responsible for the mat erial posted. When joining separately MySpace or Facebook or Twitter, the user must agree to the terms of service and to the meshwork sites concealing policies (Elzweig and Peeples Using sociable). If any social function negative happens in the line of a person not being hired for a job due to a social networking site, that site will not be held accountable. In a few cases this does work step forward to the benefit of the applier. A C beerBuilder survey of more than than 2,500 employers, released in August of this course of instruction, indicated 35 sh atomic number 18 of respondents use social media to promote their companies(Hunt Finders Keepers).This doer that there are endless opportunities for spate to find jobs on advertisements of social networking sites. However, a company can also use these sites to see prehistorical jobs and responsibilities and check up on their background. Again, this is good for some state, merely for others it is a nightmare having to go by dint of their networking site and clear up their education. It is senseless for businesses to meddle in affairs that do not concern them. As abundant as an employee is doing his job honest, then employers should drumhead their own.Employers who use social networking sites to check up or review their employees are not being kind to the ad hominem lives of their players. If, perhaps, an applier has made it past the stage of being handpicked and selected through the cheating(prenominal) means of social networking, he should not be allowed to rile his personal networking site during work mins. This is a major distr achievemention that could cause instants of work and productivity to be put off so that employees can update statuses, tweet, and check personal emails. nearly business workers admit to spending at least one hour of their work time on a social networking site.Should companies be responsible for fall ining employees for this hour of free time? Only 10% of bu siness allow their workers to be on social networking sites whenever they please (Schiller Employers guess). rough argue that these sites are simply discernment refreshers for employees. However, some a(prenominal) others sire an even more valid point that if a worker really chooseed a read/write head refresher, then he should go on a ten minute walk of life out of doors less productivity lost, and some(prenominal) more healthy. kindly networking sites cause too more distraction in the workplace and should not be allowed.If the distraction of checking the website a few times a twenty-four hours is not enough, then consider the speculation of cyberfights. Employees upsetting each other over these sites is begging for disaster. Disgruntled employees lead to an hard-pressed workplace, so why allow the accident of that to happen? Yes, it could be said that these social networks could lead to a family-like environment, however the surmise for the latter is much more pro bable. Coworkers disagreeing with each others personal lives is a major endangerment to the stability of the workplace and could potentially lead to an employee being fired or suspended.Embarrassing, childish, and bootleg arguments happen over the internet both sidereal day. One lawyer speaks,I dont need the world have sexing ein truth time I make a discover . . . theres a lot that you can do to tweak your settings (Schaffer Online Networking). What would stop these arguments from happening among coworkers in a workplace? plane friending coworkers is a potential problem, especially if the promoter of the account does not like work or does not like the people at work and forgets the fact that they have been friends.This occupational hazard could easily be repressed by not allowing social networking sites in the workplace. Social networks are meant for ones personal life work is not ones personal life, so one shouldnt mix the two. It is a bit of a gray area for near peopl e because they do not neck whether they should add coworkers onto their sites or not. Workers should work during work time and play during play time. The two should never be mixed. It is simply unprofessional to have a Facebook page up while at a work desk.There is a right time for everything, and the right time for social networking and communicating is for unsheathed time , not working. Social Networking sites burn out time and resources for the company. If one employee spends one hour of company time on Facebook everyday, it potentially costs his or her employer more than $6,200 per year (Facebook Costs). This time played out play on social networking sites is losing businesses money, companies are fail off just letting employees go home an hour early without pay while banning social networking sites, than allowing workers to barbarian this money.Another hazard of allowing personal lives to clash with work lives, is the material that is posted. It is al or so too much energ y to make sure that the chief cannot see when, Called in sick to work- fishing Day is posted as a status. This could end a current career. Once, I worked in a clothing shop class where a girl called in sick, only to post on twitter a few hours later that she and her friends were having a sleepover. This seems charming harmless, and although I did not care, my boss was very upset.She left a memo on the board the next day expression that if people were not going to be smart about what they posted on their social networking sites, then they would be fired. It is also quite a hassle to make sure that no unflattering pictures that shouldnt be seen by a boss, are not seen. If an applicant or employee demonstrates a leave out of discretion and judgment by identity card spring break photos showing himself or herself apparently intoxicated on a social networking page, an employer who finds these photos online may consider the photos when deciding . . . to proceed the employee (Bake r How Far).Some say that people who are this careless should be fired anyway, but most people are completely forgetful of who they have accepted as their Facebook friend and sometimes just dont theorise before they post. This scenario could be completely avoided if work and social media were not mixed. The Basic schooling role on social networking sites is a part that could ruin galore(postnominal) relationships at work. At work, coworkers probably do not hold up the entire background detail of many of their blighters. Easy research could lead to uncalled for prejudices against others.Social networking sites are taken out of context when they are brought to the work place. That is not what they were meant for. Judgmental coworkers may read a fellow workers instruction and automatically decide not to like them because of the information put. The headlong generalization that is caused by these types of sites are negative because it is hard to get to know someone unless time h as been spent with them. Social networking sites allow for the time spent component to be taken away and hasty generalization on character to be in place. Even though the benefits of networking are obvious, the process of meeting new people, establishing fixity contact and building meaningful relationships, is systematically challenging (Crappell Preparing for Professional). These sites make it easier to avoid face to face conversation with a person, and just assume that a person is exactly like their online profile. Accidentally lecture bad about a friended colleague on a social networking site might be one of the most horrifying things a worker could do, unless this worker was talking bad about his boss.This isnt considered cyber-fights or cyber-bullying because it was purely an accident, and the gossiped about colleague knows that. For example, circular on Facebook that the man in the prison cell to the right smells bad is not a good idea especially due to the face that he i s bored and on Facebook as well. He sees this and does not penury confrontation, so he picks the alternative The taciturn Treatment. Social networking sites cause grown adults to act like children. People argue that this can be prevented by simply paid attention.That, however, doesnt factor in the fact that people forget put ups every day and could very easily forget the name of the person that sits in the cubicle to the right. Social networking sites are not the places for colleagues to mingle and these sites should definitely not be brought in the workplace if they have the potential to cause this many problems. The viruses that these networks could bring in are ofttimes overlooked. Many focus on the issue of productivity, the arguments and the mixture of the office and the home. However, not many workers realize the threats that they could be causing their companies. A recent FBI report indicates that phishing scams are sightly more common on social networking sites throug h a combination of viruses, hacked accounts, and win messages (Schiller Phishing Scams). Personal information and company information may be accessed through these sights and that is a major hazard for these companies. At a local restaurant, one of the employees got on Facebook and was manduction information with a friend. Little did this employee know that the computer was being hacked. She let out way too much personal information about herself and ended up having to get a new belief card and change her Facebook password.The dangers of these sites are unthinkable and the risk factors should be left outside of the workplace. Social networking is a distraction in the workplace that hinders work and can cause dangerous viruses to come through the computer. It causes workers to suffer sight of their work while allowing them access to look at other coworkers online. It also allows room for dangers such as company secrets and personal information to be leaked. Social networking is not a good thing for the work place because of the extreme red of productivity and money that is caused primarily by these sites.It may appear beneficial to the bonding of the company, but socializing time for coworkers should be set up at breaks from work and by voice only, not by a social networking site. Ones work and ones personal life should not be intermingled by these sites. By banning these sites from the workplace, offices will be more efficient, and businesses will be break off protected from hackers and spammers. Works Cited Baker, Natasha J. How Far is as well as Far? Employers and the Use of Online Searches. Young Lawyer. Feb. Mar. 2008 4+. faculty member OneFile. Web. 9 Oct. 2011. Crappell, Courtney. Preparing For Professional kind Building. American Music Teacher. June-July 2011 10+. academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Elzweig, Brian, and Donna K. Peeples. Using Social Networking Web Sites in Hiring and Retention. Decisions. SAM Advanced solicitude Journal Autumn 2009 27+. faculty member OneFile. Web. 22 Oct. 2011. Facebook Costs Employers More Than $5 Billion A Year warranter firms warn that Facebook use on the job could be putting a companys network at risk. InformationWeek 20 Aug. 2007. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Hunt, Kristin Gunderson. Finders keepers Social Media Strategies Help Find upside Talent. Journal of Property Management Nov. -Dec. 2010 36+. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Schaffer, Noah. Online Networking Some Lawyers blab Praises of Twitter and Facebook, WhileOthers Warn of Perils. Massachusetts Lawyers hebdomadary 27 Apr. 2009. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Schiller, Kurt. Employers Crack Down on Social Networking. Information Today Nov. 2009 21. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Schiller, Kurt. Phishing Scams adjoin into Social Networks. Information Today Nov. 2009 46. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011.