Air traffic essay Essay

Today many hoi polloi state that the authorities bring in to lighten air commerce by introducing rising charges, because airports generate a lot of noise and wrong environment. The reason is huge demand for cheap flights, so there are too many good deal to use airline services. In my opinion, this idea is completely wrong, because of several reasons.To begin with, if there be slight populate, who can afford themselves to travel by air, then they result choose cars and other ground transport, what forget cause a lot more pollution and craft jams on the roads. Just compare snow multitude on one plane and one C people on 100 cars. It goes without saying that endorsement option is much more damaging for environment.Moreover, such soluton go outing cause dramatical fall in avocation activity, because people will not be competent to control production performance, visit important meetings and so on. Some people will say that these are just minor set-backs, but in fact, we will face the catalyst of recent world economic recession.Finally, I see reducing air traffic as a slow-down of progress. If airlines and airports hold in little financial resources then they will not be open to maintain their development teams. As a result, world will be one-step further from creating new ways of air travel. Following topics logic, we should start living in lairs and eat with the stick.In conclusion I want to say that services that enjoys great demand are essential for people and they became natural part of societys infrastructure. Today many people state that the authorities have to lighten air traffic by introducing new charges, because airports generate a lot of noise and disparage environment. The reason is huge demand for cheap flights, so there are too many people to use airline services. In my opinion, this idea is completely wrong, because of several reasons.To begin with, if there be less people, who can afford themselves to travel by air, then they will choose cars and other ground transport, what will cause a lot more pollution and traffic jams on the roads. Just compare 100 people on one plane and 100 people on 100 cars. It goes without saying that plump for option is much more damaging for environment.Moreover, such soluton will cause dramatical fall in parentage activity, because people will not be able to control production performance, visit important meetings and so on. Some people will say that these are just minor set-backs, but in fact, we will face the catalyst of new world economic recession.Finally, I see reducing air traffic as a slow-down of progress. If airlines and airports have less financial resources then they will not be able to maintain their development teams. As a result, world will be one-step further from creating new ways of air travel. Following topics logic, we should start living in lairs and eat with the stick.In conclusion I want to say that services that enjoys great demand are essential for people and they became natural part of societys infrastructure.